Britain has solved the problem of children behaving badly online by removing the children and keeping everyone else.

The UK government announced on June 15 that social media companies will no longer be able to offer their services to under-16s, with regulations expected before the end of the year and enforcement to follow. The stated goal is to protect children from harmful online environments, and nine out of ten parents who responded to the consultation backed a ban. The plan goes further than Australia's, covering livestreaming and stranger contact on a wider range of services.

NewsThump's October 30 satire simply follows the policy to its logical endpoint: platforms populated exclusively by people old enough to know better. The satirical adults keep their full posting rights, including threatening strangers over the correct way to cook a jacket potato, circulating fabricated stories because a mate shared them, and announcing their departure from Facebook before returning eleven minutes later to ask why nobody commented.

Age verification, in this telling, can establish whether someone was born before 2011. Establishing whether they have developed emotionally since then remains beyond current technology.

Like your satire sourced?

Get the Dispatch — the week's sharpest offenses, with receipts attached.

The ban protects children from the timeline. Nobody has yet proposed protecting the timeline from the grown-ups.

The underlying reporting is filed in the Evidence Locker: NewsThump (Oct. 30, 2026); GOV.UK (July 2026).